Resolve "Remove local working arrays and subroutine arguments that are no longer used after the removal of MLF"
requested to merge 482-remove-local-working-arrays-that-are-no-longer-used-after-the-removal-of-key_rk3 into main
Closes #482 (closed).
Tests
Regular checks
-
Can this change be shown to produce expected impact (option activated)? -
Can this change be shown to have a null impact (option not activated)? -
Results of the required bit comparability tests been run: are there no differences when activating the development? If some differences appear, is reason for the change valid/understood?If some differences appear, is the impact as expected on model configurations?
-
Is this change expected to preserve all diagnostics? If no, is reason for the change valid/understood?
Are there significant changes in run time/memory?
Review
Assessments
-
Is the proposed methodology now implemented? -
Are the code changes in agreement with the flowchart defined at preview step? -
Are the code changes in agreement with list of routines and variables as proposed at preview step? -
If, not, are the discrepancies acceptable?
-
[ ] Is the in-line documentation accurate and sufficient?-
Do the code changes comply with NEMO coding standards? [ ] Is the development documented with sufficient details for others to understand the impact of the change?- ~[ ] Is the project
doc (manual, guide, web, ...) now updated or completed following the proposed summary in preview section?
Edited by Sibylle Techene