Newer
Older
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
(observed, climatological or an atmospheric model product),
\textit{SSS}$_{Obs}$ is a sea surface salinity
(usually a time interpolation of the monthly mean Polar Hydrographic Climatology \citep{steele.morley.ea_JC01}),
$\left.S\right|_{k=1}$ is the model surface layer salinity and
$\gamma_s$ is a negative feedback coefficient which is provided as a namelist parameter.
Unlike heat flux, there is no physical justification for the feedback term in \autoref{eq:SBC_dmp_emp} as
the atmosphere does not care about ocean surface salinity \citep{madec.delecluse_IWN97}.
The SSS restoring term should be viewed as a flux correction on freshwater fluxes to
reduce the uncertainties we have on the observed freshwater budget.
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection{Handling of ice-covered area (\textit{sbcice\_...})}
\label{subsec:SBC_ice-cover}
The presence at the sea surface of an ice covered area modifies all the fluxes transmitted to the ocean.
There are several way to handle sea-ice in the system depending on
the value of the \np{nn_ice}{nn\_ice} namelist parameter found in \nam{sbc}{sbc} namelist.
\begin{description}
\item [nn\_ice = 0] there will never be sea-ice in the computational domain.
This is a typical namelist value used for tropical ocean domain.
The surface fluxes are simply specified for an ice-free ocean.
No specific things is done for sea-ice.
\item [nn\_ice = 1] sea-ice can exist in the computational domain, but no sea-ice model is used.
An observed ice covered area is read in a file.
Below this area, the SST is restored to the freezing point and
the heat fluxes are set to $-4~W/m^2$ ($-2~W/m^2$) in the northern (southern) hemisphere.
The associated modification of the freshwater fluxes are done in such a way that
the change in buoyancy fluxes remains zero.
This prevents deep convection to occur when trying to reach the freezing point
(and so ice covered area condition) while the SSS is too large.
This manner of managing sea-ice area, just by using a IF case,
is usually referred as the \textit{ice-if} model.
It can be found in the \mdl{sbcice\_if} module.
\item [nn\_ice = 2 or more] A full sea ice model is used.
This model computes the ice-ocean fluxes,
that are combined with the air-sea fluxes using the ice fraction of each model cell to
provide the surface averaged ocean fluxes.
Note that the activation of a sea-ice model is done by defining a CPP key (\key{si3}).
The activation automatically overwrites the read value of nn\_ice to its appropriate value
(\ie\ $2$ for SI3).
\end{description}
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection[Freshwater budget control (\textit{sbcfwb.F90})]{Freshwater budget control (\protect\mdl{sbcfwb})}
\label{subsec:SBC_fwb}
\begin{listing}
\nlst{namsbc_fwb}
\caption{\forcode{&namsbc_fwb}}
\label{lst:namsbc_fwb}
\end{listing}
For global ocean simulations, it can be useful to introduce a control of the
mean sea level in order to prevent unrealistic drifting of the sea surface
height due to unbalanced freshwater fluxes. In \NEMO, two options for
controlling the freshwater budget are proposed.
\begin{description}
\item [{\np[=0]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}:] No control at all; the mean sea level is
free to drift, and will certainly do so.
\item [{\np[=1]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}:] The global mean \textit{emp} is set to zero at each model time step.
%GS: comment below still relevant ?
%Note that with a sea-ice model, this technique only controls the mean sea level with linear free surface and no mass flux between ocean and ice (as it is implemented in the current ice-ocean coupling).
\item [{\np[=2]{nn_fwb}{nn\_fwb}}:] \textit{emp} is adjusted by adding a
spatially uniform, annual-mean freshwater flux that balances the freshwater
budget at the end of the previous year; as the model uses the Boussinesq
approximation, the freshwater budget can be evaluated from the change in the
mean sea level and in the ice and snow mass after the end of each simulation
year; at the start of the model run, an initial adjustment flux can be set
using parameter \np{rn_rwb0}{rn\_fwb0} in namelist \nam{sbc_fwb}{sbc\_fwb}.
\end{description}
% Griffies doc:
% When running ocean-ice simulations, we are not explicitly representing land processes,
% such as rivers, catchment areas, snow accumulation, etc. However, to reduce model drift,
% it is important to balance the hydrological cycle in ocean-ice models.
% We thus need to prescribe some form of global normalization to the precipitation minus evaporation plus river runoff.
% The result of the normalization should be a global integrated zero net water input to the ocean-ice system over
% a chosen time scale.
% How often the normalization is done is a matter of choice. In mom4p1, we choose to do so at each model time step,
% so that there is always a zero net input of water to the ocean-ice system.
% Others choose to normalize over an annual cycle, in which case the net imbalance over an annual cycle is used
% to alter the subsequent year�s water budget in an attempt to damp the annual water imbalance.
% Note that the annual budget approach may be inappropriate with interannually varying precipitation forcing.
% When running ocean-ice coupled models, it is incorrect to include the water transport between the ocean
% and ice models when aiming to balance the hydrological cycle.
% The reason is that it is the sum of the water in the ocean plus ice that should be balanced when running ocean-ice models,
% not the water in any one sub-component. As an extreme example to illustrate the issue,
% consider an ocean-ice model with zero initial sea ice. As the ocean-ice model spins up,
% there should be a net accumulation of water in the growing sea ice, and thus a net loss of water from the ocean.
% The total water contained in the ocean plus ice system is constant, but there is an exchange of water between
% the subcomponents. This exchange should not be part of the normalization used to balance the hydrological cycle
% in ocean-ice models.
\subinc{\input{../../global/epilogue}}
\end{document}