Newer
Older
Andrew Coward
committed
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
\documentclass[../main/NEMO_manual]{subfiles}
\begin{document}
\chapter{Ocean Dynamics (D2D)}
\label{chap:D2D}
\chaptertoc
\paragraph{Changes record} ~\\
{\footnotesize
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{l||X|X}
Release & Author(s) & Modifications \\
\hline
{\em 4.0} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\
{\em 3.6} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\
{\em 3.4} & {\em ...} & {\em ...} \\
{\em <=3.4} & {\em ...} & {\em ...}
\end{tabularx}
}
\clearpage
Using the representation described in \autoref{chap:DOM},
several semi-discrete space forms of the dynamical equations are available depending on
the vertical coordinate used and on the conservation properties of the vorticity term.
In all the equations presented here, the masking has been omitted for simplicity.
One must be aware that all the quantities are masked fields and
that each time an average or difference operator is used, the resulting field is multiplied by a mask.
The prognostic ocean dynamics equation can be summarized as follows:
\[
\text{NXT} = \dbinom {\text{VOR} + \text{KEG} + \text {ZAD} }
{\text{COR} + \text{ADV} }
+ \text{HPG} + \text{SPG} + \text{LDF} + \text{ZDF}
\]
NXT stands for next, referring to the time-stepping.
The first group of terms on the rhs of this equation corresponds to the Coriolis and advection terms that
are decomposed into either a vorticity part (VOR), a kinetic energy part (KEG) and
a vertical advection part (ZAD) in the vector invariant formulation,
or a Coriolis and advection part (COR+ADV) in the flux formulation.
The terms following these are the pressure gradient contributions
(HPG, Hydrostatic Pressure Gradient, and SPG, Surface Pressure Gradient);
and contributions from lateral diffusion (LDF) and vertical diffusion (ZDF),
which are added to the rhs in the \mdl{dynldf} and \mdl{dynzdf} modules.
The vertical diffusion term includes the surface and bottom stresses.
The external forcings and parameterisations require complex inputs
(surface wind stress calculation using bulk formulae, estimation of mixing coefficients)
that are carried out in modules SBC, LDF and ZDF and are described in
\autoref{chap:SBC}, \autoref{chap:LDF} and \autoref{chap:ZDF}, respectively.
In the present chapter we describe the equations used to compute the barotropic velocities and
the sea surface height that provides the surface pressure gradient.
Andrew Coward
committed
%% =================================================================================================
\section[Surface pressure gradient (\textit{dynspg.F90}/\textit{stp2d.F90})]
{Surface pressure gradient (\protect\mdl{dynspg}/\protect\mdl{stp2d})}
Andrew Coward
committed
\label{sec:D2D_spg}
The surface pressure gradient term is related to the representation of the free surface
Andrew Coward
committed
(\autoref{sec:MB_hor_pg}). The main distinction is between the fixed volume case (linear
free surface, \ie\ with the inclusion of \key{linssh}) and the variable volume case
(nonlinear free surface, \key{qco}). In the linear free surface case
(\autoref{subsec:MB_free_surface}) the vertical scale factors $e_{3}$ are fixed in time,
while they are time-dependent in the nonlinear case (\autoref{subsec:MB_free_surface}).
With both linear and nonlinear free surface, external gravity waves are allowed in the
equations, which imposes a very small time step when an explicit time stepping is used
(\np[=.true.]{ln_dynspg_exp}{ln\_dynspg\_exp} (MLF time-stepping only)). To allow a
longer time step for the three-dimensional equations, one can use a split-explicit free
surface (\np[=.true.]{ln_dynspg_ts}{ln\_dynspg\_ts}). In that case, only a quasi-linear
Andrew Coward
committed
form of 2d barotropic equations is substepped with a small time increment.
Options are defined through the \nam{dyn_spg}{dyn\_spg} namelist variables.
\begin{listing}
\nlst{namdyn_spg}
\caption{\forcode{&namdyn_spg}}
\label{lst:namdyn_spg}
\end{listing}
Andrew Coward
committed
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection[Explicit free surface (\forcode{ln_dynspg_exp})]
{Explicit free surface (\protect\np{ln_dynspg_exp}{ln\_dynspg\_exp})}
Andrew Coward
committed
\label{subsec:D2D_spg_exp}
With MLF time-stepping there is an explicit free surface formulation
(\np[=.true.]{ln_dynspg_exp}{ln\_dynspg\_exp}), for which the model time step must be
chosen to be small enough to resolve the external gravity waves (typically a few tens of
seconds). The surface pressure gradient, evaluated using a leap-frog scheme (\ie\
centered in time), is thus simply given by :
Andrew Coward
committed
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:DYN_spg_exp}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
- \frac{1}{e_{1u}\,\rho_o} \; \delta_{i+1/2} \left[ \,\rho \,\eta\, \right] \\
- \frac{1}{e_{2v}\,\rho_o} \; \delta_{j+1/2} \left[ \,\rho \,\eta\, \right]
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
Note that this option is not yet available with RK3 time-stepping.
Andrew Coward
committed
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection[Split-explicit free surface (\forcode{ln_dynspg_ts})]{Split-explicit free surface (\protect\np{ln_dynspg_ts}{ln\_dynspg\_ts})}
\label{subsec:D2D_spg_ts}
%\nlst{namsplit}
The split-explicit free surface formulation used in \NEMO\
(\np{ln_dynspg_ts}{ln\_dynspg\_ts} set to true), also called the time-splitting
formulation, follows the one proposed by \citet{shchepetkin.mcwilliams_OM05}. The general
idea is to solve the free surface equation and the associated barotropic velocity
equations with a smaller time step than $\rdt$, the time step used for the three
dimensional prognostic variables (\autoref{fig:D2D_spg_ts}). The size of the small time
step, $\rdt_e$ (the external mode or barotropic time step) is provided through the
\np{nn_e}{nn\_e} namelist parameter as: $\rdt_e = \rdt / nn\_e$. This parameter can be
optionally defined automatically (\np[=.true.]{ln_bt_auto}{ln\_bt\_auto}) considering that
the stability of the barotropic system is essentially controled by external waves
propagation. Maximum Courant number is in that case time independent, and easily computed
online from the input bathymetry. Therefore, $\rdt_e$ is adjusted so that the Maximum
allowed Courant number is smaller than \np{rn_bt_cmax}{rn\_bt\_cmax}.
The barotropic mode solves the following equations:
% \begin{subequations}
% \label{eq:D2D_BT}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:D2D_BT_dyn}
\frac{\partial {\mathrm \overline{{\mathbf U}}_h} }{\partial t}=
-f\;{\mathrm {\mathbf k}}\times {\mathrm \overline{{\mathbf U}}_h}
-g\nabla _h \eta -\frac{c_b^{\textbf U}}{H+\eta} \mathrm {\overline{{\mathbf U}}_h} + \mathrm {\overline{\mathbf G}}
\end{equation}
\[
% \label{eq:D2D_BT_ssh}
\frac{\partial \eta }{\partial t}=-\nabla \cdot \left[ {\left( {H+\eta } \right) \; {\mathrm{\mathbf \overline{U}}}_h \,} \right]+P-E
\]
% \end{subequations}
where $\mathrm {\overline{\mathbf G}}$ is a forcing term held constant, containing
coupling term between modes, surface atmospheric forcing as well as slowly varying
barotropic terms not explicitly computed to gain efficiency. The third term on the right
hand side of \autoref{eq:D2D_BT_dyn} represents the bottom stress (see section
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
\autoref{sec:ZDF_drg}), explicitly accounted for at each barotropic iteration.
For 'single 1$^{\mathrm st}$', RK3 time-stepping, barotropic velocities and sea surface
height are calculated for the {\textit after} timestep from the {\textit before} values
prior to the first stage of the main RK3 timestepping. This occurs in the new module
\forcode{stp2d.F90} which computes the RHS forcing terms from {\textit before} fields and
then calls the \forcode{dyn_spg_ts} routine to perform the time-stepping as detailed
below. In the MLF time-stepping case, RHS forcing terms are computed inside
\forcode{dyn_spg_ts} itself and the time index used will depend on options chosen in
\forcode{namspgts}.
For clarity, in RK3 the RHS forcing terms on momentum are vertically averaged 3D trends of:
\[
\text{HPG} + \text{LDF} + \text {(COR + RVO)} + \text{KEG} + \text{ZAD}
\]
for the Vector invariant formulation (for which the 3D fields are also the RHS terms for
the 1$^{\mathrm st}$ stage RK3 time stepping) and:
\[
\text{HPG} + \text{LDF} + \text {(COR + MET)} + \text{ADV}
\]
for the flux form. In the latter case ADV must be recomputed at the 1$^{\mathrm st}$ stage.
The new terms in these summaries are: RVO - Relative Vorticity and MET - Metric term.
External forcing is also applied in the form of baroclinic bottom drag and surface winds.
Other external forcings may be optionally applied as detailed in
\autoref{subsec:D2D_forcing}.
For ssh, the external forcing is the net column-average freshwater flux. This is
evaporation minus prepcitation plus optional contributions from other sources as listed in
\autoref{subsec:D2D_forcing}.
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection{Split-explicit time-stepping (\protect\mdl{dynspg\_ts})}
\label{subsec:D2D_spg_ts_ts}
Temporal discretization of the system above follows a three-time step Generalized Forward
Backward algorithm detailed in \citet{shchepetkin.mcwilliams_OM05}. AB3-AM4 coefficients
used in \NEMO\ follow the second-order accurate, "multi-purpose" stability compromise as
defined in \citet{shchepetkin.mcwilliams_ibk09} (see their figure 12, lower left).
Andrew Coward
committed
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.66\textwidth]{DYN_dynspg_ts}
\caption[Split-explicit time stepping scheme for the external and internal modes]{
Schematic of the split-explicit time stepping scheme for the external and internal modes.
Time increases to the right.
In this particular exemple,
a boxcar averaging window over \np{nn_e}{nn\_e} barotropic time steps is used
(\np[=1]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}) and \np[=5]{nn_e}{nn\_e}.
Internal mode time steps (which are also the model time steps) are denoted by
$t-\rdt$, $t$ and $t+\rdt$.
Variables with $k$ superscript refer to instantaneous barotropic variables,
$< >$ and $<< >>$ operator refer to time filtered variables using respectively primary
(red vertical bars) and secondary weights (blue vertical bars).
The former are used to obtain time filtered quantities at $t+\rdt$ while
the latter are used to obtain time averaged transports to advect tracers.
a) Forward time integration:
\protect\np[=1]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}.
b) Centred time integration:
\protect\np[=2]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}.
c) Forward time integration with no time filtering (POM-like scheme):
\protect\np[=3]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}.}
\label{fig:D2D_spg_ts}
\end{figure}
In the default case (\protect\np[=1]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}), the external mode is
integrated between \textit{now} and \textit{after} baroclinic time-steps
(\autoref{fig:D2D_spg_ts}a). To avoid aliasing of fast barotropic motions into three
dimensional equations, time filtering is eventually applied on barotropic quantities. In
that case, the integration is extended slightly beyond \textit{after} time step to provide
time filtered quantities. These are used for the subsequent initialization of the
barotropic mode in the following baroclinic step. Since external mode equations written
at baroclinic time steps finally follow a forward time stepping scheme, asselin filtering
is not applied to barotropic quantities.\\ Alternatively, one can choose to integrate
barotropic equations starting from \textit{before} time step
(\protect\np[=2]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}). Although more computationaly expensive (
\np{nn_e}{nn\_e} additional iterations are indeed necessary), the baroclinic to barotropic
forcing term given at \textit{now} time step become centred in the middle of the
integration window. It can easily be shown that this property removes part of splitting
errors between modes, which increases the overall numerical robustness. %references to
Patrick Marsaleix' work here. Also work done by SHOM group.
Andrew Coward
committed
As far as tracer conservation is concerned, barotropic velocities used to advect tracers
must also be updated at \textit{now} time step. This implies to change the traditional
order of computations in \NEMO: most of momentum trends (including the barotropic mode
calculation) updated first, tracers' after. Advective barotropic velocities are obtained
by using a secondary set of filtering weights, uniquely defined from the filter
coefficients used for the time averaging (\citet{shchepetkin.mcwilliams_OM05}).
Consistency between the time averaged continuity equation and the time stepping of tracers
is here the key to obtain exact conservation.
One can eventually choose to feedback instantaneous values by not using any time filter
(\protect\np[=3]{nn_bt_flt}{nn\_bt\_flt}). In that case, external mode equations are
continuous in time, \ie\ they are not re-initialized when starting a new sub-stepping
sequence. This is the method used in the POM model for example, the stability being
maintained by refreshing at (almost) each barotropic time step advection and horizontal
diffusion terms. Since the latter terms have not been added in \NEMO\ for computational
efficiency, removing time filtering would be inevitably unstable. One can however add some
dissipation, but in the time domain, by slightly modifying the barotropic time stepping
coefficients (\citet{demange_JCP19}). This is implemented here through an additional
parameter (\np{rn_bt_alpha}{rn\_bt\_alpha}), which controls the amount of temporal
diffusion.
Andrew Coward
committed
%% =================================================================================================
\subsection{External forcings}
\label{subsec:D2D_forcing}
Andrew Coward
committed
Besides the surface and bottom baroclinic stresses four other forcings may enter the barotropic
momentum equations.
Andrew Coward
committed
(1) When \np[=.true.]{ln_apr_dyn}{ln\_apr\_dyn} (see \autoref{sec:SBC_apr}),
the atmospheric pressure is taken into account when computing the surface pressure gradient.
Andrew Coward
committed
(2) When \np[=.true.]{ln_tide_pot}{ln\_tide\_pot} and \np[=.true.]{ln_tide}{ln\_tide} (see
\autoref{sec:SBC_TDE}), the tidal potential is taken into account when computing the
surface pressure gradient.
Andrew Coward
committed
(3) When \np[=2]{nn_ice_embd}{nn\_ice\_embd} and SI3 is used (\ie\ when the sea-ice is
embedded in the ocean), the snow-ice mass is taken into account when computing the surface
pressure gradient.
Andrew Coward
committed
(4) When \np[=.true.]{ln_wave .AND. ln_bern_srfc}{ln\_wave .AND. ln\_bern\_srfc} (see
\autoref{subsec:SBC_wave_bhd}) , a depth-uniform wave-induced kinematic pressure term (the
Bernoulli head) is added to the mean pressure.
Andrew Coward
committed
Andrew Coward
committed
\noindent The net column-average freshwater flux applied to the ssh equation can also be modified by
the following options:
Andrew Coward
committed
(1) When \np[=.true.]{ln_rnf}{ln\_rnf} (see \autoref{sec:SBC_rnf}),
river runoff is taken into account when computing the net freshwater flux.
Andrew Coward
committed
(2) When \np[=.true.]{ln_isf}{ln\_isf} (see \autoref{sec:SBC_isf}), explicit or
parameterised contributions from ice-shelf cavities are taken into account when computing
the net freshwater flux.
Andrew Coward
committed
(3) When \np[=.true.]{ln_sdw}{ln\_sdw} (see \autoref{sec:SBC_wave_sdw}), the contribution from
divergence due to Stoke's drift is taken into account when computing the net freshwater
flux.
Andrew Coward
committed
(4) When \np[=.true.]{ln_isf .AND. ln_isfcpl}{ln\_isf .AND. ln\_isfcpl} (see
\autoref{sec:SBC_isf}), the conribution from coupled ice-sheets is taken into account when
computing the net freshwater flux.
Andrew Coward
committed
(5) When \np[=.true.]{lk_asminc .AND. ln_sshinc .AND. ln_asmiau}{lk\_asminc .AND.
ln\_sshinc .AND. ln\_asmiau} (see \autoref{sec:ASM_IAU}), the conribution from IAU
weighted ssh increments is taken into account when computing the net freshwater flux.