Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit b0bc822c authored by Pierre Mathiot's avatar Pierre Mathiot
Browse files

minor changes after review

parent 1f9cb190
No related branches found
No related tags found
1 merge request!51Resolve "Modification across chapters for ISF/ICB"
Pipeline #3844 passed with stage
in 2 minutes and 25 seconds
...@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ Where $r3t(i,j,t) = \frac{\eta(i,j,t)}{\mathrm{ht\_0}(i,j)}$, ...@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ Where $r3t(i,j,t) = \frac{\eta(i,j,t)}{\mathrm{ht\_0}(i,j)}$,
the ratio of sea surface height to reference water column height, the ratio of sea surface height to reference water column height,
is updated at every time step by \rou{domqco\_r3c} and where is updated at every time step by \rou{domqco\_r3c} and where
\forcode{e3t_0}, \forcode{ht_0} and \forcode{tmask} are the $T$-point variants of the reference vertical scale \forcode{e3t_0}, \forcode{ht_0} and \forcode{tmask} are the $T$-point variants of the reference vertical scale
factor, the reference water height, and the land-sea mask, respectively. factor, the reference water column height, and the land-sea mask, respectively.
Similar expressions are applied to the scale factors at $u$/$v$/$f$-points using appropriate interpolation of $\eta$. Similar expressions are applied to the scale factors at $u$/$v$/$f$-points using appropriate interpolation of $\eta$.
In the expressions for the scale factors at $w$-levels, grid point depths and water heights, In the expressions for the scale factors at $w$-levels, grid point depths and water heights,
the ratio is instead unmasked. the ratio is instead unmasked.
...@@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ Unlike in the previous approach, the height of the $T$-points remains unchanged. ...@@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ Unlike in the previous approach, the height of the $T$-points remains unchanged.
This representation is described in \citep{kevlahan_GMD15}, it is This representation is described in \citep{kevlahan_GMD15}, it is
based on Brinkman penalization where a control parameter \ie\ the porosity modifies fluxes though penalized lateral surfaces. based on Brinkman penalization where a control parameter \ie\ the porosity modifies fluxes though penalized lateral surfaces.
This parameter is encapsulated within vertical scale factors ($e3t^0$, $e3u^0$, $e3v^0$) as illustrated in \autoref{fig:DOM_partial_step_scheme}. This parameter is encapsulated within vertical scale factors ($e3t^0$, $e3u^0$, $e3v^0$) as illustrated in \autoref{fig:DOM_partial_step_scheme}.
In case of ocean cavities, partial cells are also applied at the top interface using the same method as for the bottom interface but upside-down.
\begin{figure} \begin{figure}
\centering \centering
...@@ -639,8 +640,8 @@ Based on variables \forcode{top_level} and \forcode{bottom_level}, the mask vari ...@@ -639,8 +640,8 @@ Based on variables \forcode{top_level} and \forcode{bottom_level}, the mask vari
Note that, without ice shelves cavities, Note that, without ice shelves cavities,
masks at $T$- and $w$-points are identical with the numerical indexing used masks at $T$- and $w$-points are identical with the numerical indexing used
(see \autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index}). (see \autoref{subsec:DOM_Num_Index}).
Nevertheless, Nevertheless, with ocean cavities,
$wmask$ are required with ocean cavities to deal with the top boundary (ice shelf/ocean interface) $wmask$ are required to deal with the top boundary (ice shelf/ocean interface)
in exactly the same way as for the bottom boundary. in exactly the same way as for the bottom boundary.
%% The specification of closed lateral boundaries requires that at least %% The specification of closed lateral boundaries requires that at least
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment